Is your AI visibility audit defensible?
Confirm what your protocol already records. Get a score, the sections that are weak, and a written brief of every gap.
Free. No account. Two minutes.
Your gap brief
47 checks scored
One business decision is named
- Evidence to save
- One written sentence naming the buyer, the decision, and the alternatives in scope
- What usually costs the point
- The scope names a keyword list instead of a decision, so nobody can say what a finding is for
- Priority URLs return the intended public response
- Exact prompt text is preserved
- Executive summary answers what, evidence, and next action
and every other check you leave unconfirmed, ranked by weight.
Confirm what your protocol already records.
Leave anything you cannot evidence unticked. Those are the entries your brief is built from. This grades your method, not a brand: nothing here queries an answer engine, so it cannot tell you how visible anyone is, and it does not predict rankings, citations or revenue.
Scope and consent
0/6Approved facts
0/5Technical eligibility
0/7Prompt sample
0/6Answer observations
0/7Source and competitor map
0/5Findings and priorities
0/5Client handoff
0/60%Not yet defensible
0 of 47 confirmed
The scorecard names the gaps. The course closes them.
The AI Search Visibility Audit System is the protocol behind these 47 checks: a controlled prompt method, a technical review, a representation baseline, a source map, and the client report, proposal and 90-day roadmap that come out the other end.
See the course